Corporate Interest Restriction Rules: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
Imagine reaching the middle of your accounting period and realising that an overlooked interest adjustment has quietly reduced your available relief. By the time the issue surfaces, the damage is already done. Interest deductions are restricted, tax liabilities rise, and the opportunity to correct the position without penalties may already be gone. This scenario is more common than many finance teams expect, especially when dealing with the Corporate Interest Restriction regime.
The Corporate Interest Restriction Rules are not new, but they remain one of the most technically demanding areas of UK corporation tax. Even well resourced businesses struggle with group definitions, reporting requirements, and complex calculations. With administrative changes now in force and further procedural refinements applying to periods ending after March 2026, accuracy and consistency are more important than ever. Understanding where companies go wrong is the first step towards avoiding unnecessary restrictions and penalties.
This article focuses on common practical errors rather than providing exhaustive coverage of the entire CIR regime. Groups with complex structures, infrastructure activities, or significant intercompany financing should seek specialist advice tailored to their circumstances.
Key points of Corporate Interest Restriction Rules:
• The £2 million de minimis is based on UK group companies only, not the worldwide group
• Tax interest expense includes exchange differences on loan relationships
• Unused interest allowance carries forward indefinitely, but only if properly reported
• The debt cap may restrict relief even where the fixed ratio percentage is not exceeded
• Qualifying infrastructure companies may be exempt from CIR entirely
• Related party interest must satisfy transfer pricing requirements before entering the CIR calculation
• Consistent annual filings are essential to preserve future relief
CIR Basics Refresher
The Corporate Interest Restriction regime limits the amount of tax relief UK companies can claim on interest and financing costs when they form part of a worldwide group. A worldwide group exists where consolidated financial statements are, or would be required to be, prepared under applicable accounting standards. This is a consolidation based test rather than a size threshold based on turnover or employee numbers.
If the aggregate net tax interest expense of UK group companies exceeds £2 million in a period of account (time apportioned for periods shorter or longer than twelve months), the CIR rules may restrict how much of that interest is deductible for UK corporation tax purposes.
Alternatively, some groups can claim a higher allowance by electing for the group ratio method, which bases the allowance on the ratio of external interest to EBITDA reflected in the worldwide group’s consolidated accounts. While the underlying aim of CIR is to prevent excessive debt driven tax planning, the practical application often catches businesses off guard, especially when group structures or funding arrangements change during the year.
The Debt Cap
The debt cap is a critical but often overlooked constraint within the Corporate Interest Restriction rules. Under sections 400 to 402 TIOPA 2010, the group’s interest allowance cannot exceed its adjusted net group interest expense. This figure is derived from the consolidated financial statements of the worldwide group and represents the net external interest cost of the group as a whole.
For groups where the UK operations generate high EBITDA but the worldwide group carries relatively modest external debt, the debt cap may be the binding constraint rather than the 30 percent fixed ratio. This is particularly relevant for UK subsidiaries of overseas parent companies where most external borrowing sits outside the UK.
Mistake 1: Misunderstanding the £2 Million Threshold
One of the most frequent errors is misunderstanding how the £2 million de minimis threshold operates. This threshold determines whether the Corporate Interest Restriction rules apply at all, and getting it wrong can lead to either unnecessary compliance work or unexpected restrictions.
The threshold under section 392 TIOPA 2010 is calculated by aggregating the net tax interest expense of UK group companies only. It does not include interest paid or received by overseas members of the worldwide group. This is a crucial distinction. A UK subsidiary with modest borrowing will still be within scope if other UK group companies together have net tax interest expense exceeding £2 million.
Tax interest expense and tax interest income are defined in sections 382 to 385 TIOPA 2010. They include amounts that would be brought into account as debits or credits under the loan relationships rules in Part 5 CTA 2009, together with certain financing costs treated as interest under the derivative contracts and other financing arrangement provisions. Importantly, exchange gains and losses arising on loan relationships are generally included within these amounts rather than excluded.
Businesses sometimes look only at accounting interest figures, but the statutory definition of tax interest is broader. Items such as discounts, premiums, and certain guarantee fees may fall within scope even where they are not labelled as interest in the accounts.
Once the £2 million threshold is exceeded, reporting obligations apply regardless of whether an actual restriction arises. The safest approach is to monitor UK group wide financing costs throughout the year rather than relying on year end figures that may arrive too late to manage risk effectively.
For accounting periods shorter or longer than twelve months, the £2 million threshold is proportionately adjusted. A six month period would have a threshold of £1 million, while an eighteen month period would have a threshold of £3 million.
Mistake 2: Errors When Appointing the Reporting Company
Even when calculations are correct, procedural errors can undermine the entire CIR process. One of the most damaging mistakes is failing to appoint a valid reporting company or failing to document that appointment correctly.
The reporting company must be a UK group company. It cannot be an overseas entity even if that entity controls the UK operations. The appointment must be authorised by UK group companies representing more than 50 percent of the total, and this authorisation must be evidenced and retained. The reporting company then assumes responsibility for submitting the Interest Restriction Return on behalf of the group.
For accounting periods ending on or after 31 March 2026, HMRC allows reporting companies to be appointed retrospectively, with the appointment details disclosed within the Interest Restriction Return itself. While this change reduces administrative pressure compared with the previous requirement for advance notification, it does not remove the requirement for proper group authorisation. Failure to meet these requirements can invalidate the return and trigger penalties even where no tax advantage was sought.
Where no valid appointment is made, deemed appointment rules under Schedule 7A TIOPA 2010 may apply, designating a UK group company as the reporting company by default. However, relying on deemed appointment is not recommended as it can create uncertainty and increases the risk of compliance failures with the Corporate Interest Restriction rules.
Groups with joint venture structures or multiple worldwide groups sharing UK companies should take particular care, as separate appointments may be required for each relevant group.
Mistake 3: Errors in Fixed Ratio Calculations
The CIR fixed ratio method is often treated as the default option, but that does not make it simple. Many groups miscalculate tax-EBITDA or misclassify items within tax interest expense, leading to incorrect interest allowances.
Tax-EBITDA is not the same as accounting EBITDA. Under the Corporate Interest Restriction rules, it must be calculated for each UK group company following the statutory formula in sections 405 to 407 TIOPA 2010. The starting point is taxable total profits, to which certain amounts are added back, including capital allowances claimed, debits in respect of relevant tax interest expense, amounts of group relief claimed, and amounts of group relief for carried forward losses claimed.
Specific adjustments also apply to companies with particular activities, such as oil and gas companies and insurance companies. Losses brought forward and utilised in the period are not added back.
The aggregate tax-EBITDA of all UK group companies then forms the denominator for the fixed ratio calculation. Common errors include using accounting EBITDA without the required statutory adjustments, failing to add back capital allowances or group relief claimed, including amounts from non-UK entities, and overlooking adjustments required for specific sectors.
Small errors in these inputs can significantly distort the interest allowance. Consistent reconciliation between CIR calculations and CT600 submissions is essential to avoid mismatches that may attract HMRC scrutiny.
Worked Example: Fixed Ratio Calculation
Consider a simple UK group with two companies:
Company A:
Taxable total profits: £5,000,000
Capital allowances claimed: £400,000
Tax interest expense: £600,000
Group relief claimed: £200,000
Tax-EBITDA for Company A: £5,000,000 + £400,000 + £600,000 + £200,000 = £6,200,000
Company B:
Taxable total profits: £2,000,000
Capital allowances claimed: £150,000
Tax interest expense: £300,000
Group relief surrendered: £200,000 (not added back as this is a surrender, not a claim)
Tax-EBITDA for Company B: £2,000,000 + £150,000 + £300,000 = £2,450,000
Group position:
Aggregate tax-EBITDA: £6,200,000 + £2,450,000 = £8,650,000
Fixed ratio (30%): £8,650,000 × 30% = £2,595,000
Aggregate net tax interest expense: £600,000 + £300,000 = £900,000
In this example, the group’s net tax interest expense of £900,000 is well within the fixed ratio limit of £2,595,000, so no restriction would apply (assuming the debt cap does not impose a lower limit).
Mistake 4: Failing to Use the Group Ratio Effectively
For groups with high levels of third party borrowing, the fixed ratio method can produce an artificially low interest allowance. In these cases, the group ratio method may allow significantly more relief, but only if it is properly elected and correctly calculated.
The group ratio is calculated as the qualifying net group interest expense (QNGIE) divided by group-EBITDA, both derived from the consolidated financial statements of the worldwide group. QNGIE represents the net external interest cost of the group, excluding intragroup amounts that eliminate on consolidation. The resulting percentage replaces the 30 percent fixed ratio when calculating the interest allowance under the CIR rules.
The group ratio election must be made within a valid Interest Restriction Return for the period. It applies to the entire worldwide group for that period and cannot be made on a company by company basis. Once the election is made, it cannot be revoked for that period.
Many businesses either fail to consider this option or miss the election due to reporting company errors or incomplete worldwide financial data. Once missed, the opportunity to increase allowable deductions for that period is lost even if the group would otherwise qualify.
Before making a group ratio election, groups should model both approaches carefully. The group ratio method is not always advantageous. Where external borrowing is low relative to worldwide EBITDA, the group ratio percentage may be less than 30 percent, resulting in a worse outcome than the fixed ratio. Groups should also ensure they can obtain the necessary data from overseas affiliates in time to support the election.
Mistake 5: Failing to Preserve or Reactivate Unused Interest in CIR Rules
The Corporate Interest Restriction rules includes two distinct mechanisms for preserving and recovering the benefit of interest that cannot be relieved in the current period. Understanding the difference between these mechanisms is essential for maximising relief over time.
Interest Allowance Carry Forward
Where a group's interest allowance exceeds its aggregate net tax interest expense for a period, the unused allowance can be carried forward under section 393 TIOPA 2010. There is no time limit on this carry forward. The unused allowance can be used in any subsequent period to increase the group's interest capacity above what the fixed ratio or group ratio would otherwise permit. To preserve unused interest allowance, the group must submit a full Interest Restriction Return for the period and include an allocation statement specifying how the unused allowance is to be carried forward. Failing to file a return, or filing an abbreviated return that does not include this information, will result in the unused allowance being lost.
Interest Reactivation
Where a group's aggregate net tax interest expense exceeds its interest allowance, the excess is disallowed for corporation tax purposes. This disallowed interest does not simply disappear. Under sections 373 to 377 TIOPA 2010, it is carried forward at company level and can be reactivated in future periods when the group has spare interest capacity. Interest reactivation operates differently from allowance carry forward. The disallowed amounts are tracked at individual company level and can only be reactivated when the group files an Interest Restriction Return that includes a reactivation statement. The reactivation is then allocated to specific companies, allowing them to claim a deduction for amounts previously disallowed.
The Practical Importance of Consistent Filing
Some groups mistakenly assume that periods with low interest or no restriction require no action. This assumption can be costly. If no Interest Restriction Return is filed, any unused allowance from that period will not be available in future years, and any disallowed interest from earlier periods cannot be reactivated.
Consistent annual filings, even where restrictions are minimal or nil, are essential to protect future tax relief. Groups should treat the Interest Restriction Return as a routine annual compliance requirement rather than something triggered only when restrictions arise.
Mistake 6: Overlooking the Public Benefit Infrastructure Exemption In CIR Rules
The CIR rules includes an exemption for qualifying infrastructure companies under sections 433 to 459 TIOPA 2010. This exemption, known as the public benefit infrastructure exemption or PBIE, allows eligible companies to exclude interest relating to qualifying infrastructure activities from the CIR calculation entirely.
Qualifying infrastructure activities broadly include assets used in the provision of public infrastructure such as roads, railways, ports, and airports; assets used in regulated utility activities (water, electricity, gas distribution); social infrastructure projects such as schools, hospitals, and social housing; and certain PFI and PPP arrangements.
To benefit from the exemption, a company must meet specific conditions regarding the nature of its activities, the source of its income, and the stability of its cash flows. An election must be made in the company’s corporation tax return for each relevant period.
Groups with infrastructure activities should assess whether any of their UK companies qualify for PBIE. The exemption can provide significant relief, particularly for highly leveraged infrastructure projects that would otherwise face substantial CIR restrictions.
Mistake 7: Ignoring the Interaction with Transfer Pricing
The CIR rules does not directly target related party debt in the way that thin capitalisation rules historically did. However, the interaction between CIR and the transfer pricing provisions in Part 4 TIOPA 2010 remains important.
Before considering CIR, groups should ensure that interest rates on intercompany loans are arm’s length. If HMRC successfully challenges an intercompany interest rate as exceeding the arm’s length amount, the excess will be disallowed under transfer pricing rules regardless of CIR. The remaining arm’s length interest then enters the CIR calculation.
Equally, where guarantees are provided by group companies in respect of external borrowing, HMRC may argue that the guaranteed entity should bear a guarantee fee reflecting the credit support received. Such fees would themselves be financing costs potentially within scope of CIR.
Groups with significant intercompany financing should document their transfer pricing position carefully and ensure that arm’s length pricing is established before modelling CIR outcomes.
Penalties, Requirements, and Deadlines of Corporate Interest Restriction Rules
CIR compliance comes with strict deadlines and a specific penalty regime set out in Schedule 7A TIOPA 2010.
Filing Deadlines
Interest Restriction Returns must generally be filed within twelve months of the end of the period of account. For groups with non-coterminous accounting periods among their UK companies, determining the relevant period of account requires careful analysis.
A full Interest Restriction Return is required where the group wishes to allocate a restriction to specific companies, carry forward unused interest allowance, reactivate previously disallowed interest, or make a group ratio election. An abbreviated return may be submitted where none of these apply and the only purpose is to confirm the group's position.
Late Filing Penalties
Late filing of an Interest Restriction Return attracts fixed penalties, including an initial penalty for late filing, further daily penalties where the return remains outstanding after three months, and increased penalties for continued failure. The penalty amounts are prescribed in Schedule 7A and apply regardless of whether a restriction would have arisen.
Inaccuracy Penalties
Inaccurate returns attract penalties under the framework in Schedule 7A, which follows similar principles to the general inaccuracy penalty regime in Schedule 24 Finance Act 2007. Penalties depend on whether the inaccuracy was careless or deliberate.
Careless errors attract penalties up to 30 percent of the tax understated, deliberate errors up to 70 percent, and deliberate and concealed errors up to 100 percent. Penalties can be reduced where the taxpayer makes an unprompted disclosure and cooperates with HMRC's enquiries.
HMRC Enquiry Risk
HMRC has indicated that CIR is an area of focus, particularly regarding consistency between Interest Restriction Returns and CT600 submissions, accuracy of tax-EBITDA calculations, validity of group ratio elections and supporting worldwide data, and treatment of hybrid instruments and structured finance arrangements.
Access the official HMRC Corporate Interest Restriction (CIR) guidance:
Groups should ensure their CIR calculations are fully documented and reconciled to underlying tax computations. Where judgement has been exercised, for example in classifying complex instruments or determining group boundaries, the basis for that judgement should be recorded contemporaneously.
Joint Ventures and Complex Group Structures Under CIR Rules
The Corporate Interest Restriction rules include specific provisions for joint ventures and situations where multiple worldwide groups include the same UK companies. Sections 481 to 491 TIOPA 2010 address these scenarios, but the rules are complex and fact specific.
Where a UK company is a member of more than one worldwide group, or where joint venture arrangements create overlapping group structures, careful analysis is required to determine which worldwide group’s Interest Restriction Return should include the company, how the company’s interest capacity is allocated, and whether separate appointments of reporting companies are required.
Groups with joint venture structures should seek specialist advice to ensure their CIR treatment is correct.
Non-UK Headed Groups
Where the ultimate parent of a worldwide group is outside the UK, additional practical challenges arise under the Corporate Interest Restriction rules. The UK reporting company will need to obtain consolidated financial data from the overseas parent to calculate the debt cap and, if relevant, the group ratio. This data may not be readily available, particularly where the overseas parent prepares accounts under a different accounting framework or on a different timetable.
Groups in this position should engage with their overseas affiliates early in the compliance process to identify what information is needed and establish reliable data flows. Where consolidated accounts are not prepared because the group qualifies for an exemption, it may be necessary to prepare pro forma consolidated figures solely for CIR purposes.
Final Thoughts on Avoiding CIR Pitfalls
The Corporate Interest Restriction rules are not just a calculation exercise. It is a combination of technical analysis, procedural compliance, and ongoing group wide monitoring. Most errors arise not from aggressive tax planning but from assumptions, incomplete data, or missed deadlines.
With careful planning, regular reviews, and properly documented processes, many CIR mistakes are entirely avoidable. Businesses that take a proactive approach place themselves in a far stronger position to manage risk, protect cash flow, and respond confidently to HMRC enquiries. Getting it right is not about complexity for its own sake, but about ensuring that legitimate interest relief is not lost through preventable errors.
Sterling & Wells
We are Sterling & Wells — a UK-based team of accountants and tax advisors helping individuals and businesses stay fully HMRC compliant. From VAT and bookkeeping to self-assessments and tax planning, we’ve got your finances covered.